olivia_sutton: (Primeval)
This review was previously published on my GoodReads page on 8/16/2012

I first heard of Dr. Tony Hill and DCI Carol Jordan when I saw the television series Wire in the Blood on BBC America. I'm still collecting the series on DVD and trying to find the books.
However, this is an awesome and unusual crime/thriller series, though not for the faint of heart.
Dr. Tony Hill is a psychology professor at a fictional British university -- he literally wrote the book on serial killers. So when the Bradfield police are faced with a serial killer, DCI Jordan seeks Tony's professional advice.
It's been awhile since I've read this book, and I don't want to spoil it for those of you who have not read it, but I highly, highly recommend it!
olivia_sutton: (Primeval)
This review of Val McDermid's crime novel The Mermaids Singing first appeared on my GoodReads page and was posted on November 12, 2012.

Val McDermid's Dr. Tony Hill and Carol Jordan books are not for the faint of heart or young readers, however, for the rest of us this is a fascinating, well-written, tightly narrated novel that moves at a quick pace without running into the problem of "I'm running out of pages let's reveal the ending now" that too many books seem to have these days.

I'd first heard of Val McDermid's series when I saw "Wire in the Blood" on BBC America (cable/satellite TV). I didn't however see that series from the beginning, I caught it somewhere in the middle. So I have been slowly collecting the TV series (starring Robson Green and Hermione Norris) on DVD.

But I did also read the book Wire in the Blood (turns out it's the second book) and McDermid's The Last Temptation. It's been awhile since I read those two books in the series. But having just watched series (season) three of "Wire in the Blood" on DVD, I was in the mood for MORE so I downloaded The Mermaids Singing for my Sony e-reader in EPUB format.

The book is really good. If you like TV shows like Criminal Minds you'd probably really enjoy The Mermaids Singing. If you like gritty mysteries that don't shy away from the really gruesome aspects of a serial killer case, you'd also probably really like The Mermaids Singing If you're a fan of procedural mysteries you'll also enjoy The Mermaids Singing.

This novel is the first in the Dr. Tony Hill, Carol Jordan mystery series. It's set in the fictional Northern UK city of Bradfield. McDermid doesn't do a really good job of describing Bradfield, but I get the impression that's delibrate... the city is fictional to make it even more clear the book is fiction and to avoid stereotyping The North of the UK. As a side note, I also got the impression from this novel and other novels and films (Billy Elliott, The Full Monty that Northern England is very industrial and went through a horrible economic depression, especially in the 1970s (similar to the decline of steel and the auto industry in the US at the same time) -- in other words, poor, relatively uneducated people, very "blue collar", etc. That might be a wrong impression (being American even with a good 30 or more years as a British Media fan for both TV and books - understanding the implications of British cultural regions still throws me) but it's the impression I have.

Anyway, in Bradfield, Carol Jordan is a newly-appointed DCI for the Bradfield police. She's the first female DCI in the area, and she's investigating the brutal murder of a young man. There have been two previous murders in various parts of Bradfield and Carol thinks she has a serial murder on her hands, but the Old Guard (British equivalent of a police commissioner) pooh-poohs the idea because the young men who have been killed were found in gay districts of the city. It's worth mentioning the book takes place back in the early 90s if not earlier and was written a bit ago. Carol focuses on her job and building her team of officers and doesn't complain about the blatant sexism of her boss.

Meanwhile, Dr. Tony Hill, who literally wrote the book on serial killers is working with the Bradfield city government and police to establish a local version of a type of national criminal profiling database. This profiling taskforce will focus on all repeat crimes not just murders, and Tony had gotten the job by drawing up a profile for a serial arson case. Two things about the task-force: Tony also thinks Bradfield has a serial killer on it's hands - but he can't say anything because it's not his place, and to "go to the press" or whatever would be not only unprofessional, it would jeopardize what he's already doing - potentially doing more harm than good. It other words, his hands are tied. Tony, however, is an expert on serial killers, he's spent most of his career working in secure mental hospitals, and he's an accomplished profiler.

The database comes up several times -- and it's fascinating because the computer stuff throughout the book seems so out-of-date and anachronistic.

The one person at the beginning of the novel who not only realizes that a serial killer is at work but does something about it is another police officer, and sort-of Carol's direct supervisor. If this sounds vague -- it was, I couldn't quite keep the ranks straight in my head, and I've watched more than one British procedural police drama. Anyway, when there's another murder, he gets Tony in to draw up a profile, and appoints Carol in charge of the entire newly created taskforce to investigate. He also seconds all the individual DCIs who were assigned to the other murders to Carol. That the new victim turns out to be an off-duty police officer from another part of town complicates things. Tony and Carol, then, need to work together with the taskforce.

Dr. Tony Hill is a very damaged person; what surprised me, having read the second book first, is that Tony's issues and problems which I thought were a direct result of what happens to Tony in this book actually preceded it. The things that happen to Tony in The Mermaids Singing only make things worse. But Tony's deeply personal issues also are what created him, what made him, him, and allow him to put himself in the mind of the killer as he writes his profile. And Tony keeps his background secret -- the audience knows it, but the other characters do not, this brings a certain tension to the story.

Carol has her own issues. Yes, she's just come off a bad break-up so she's living with her brother and her cat. But she's got the intelligence at work to "grin and bear it" when dealing with her sexist boss, which is realistic. And she earns the respect of her "men", the officers in her command by being fair, direct, and working hard without complaining or whining. Also, realistically, Carol is in the position of having to be better than a man would be in her position. Again, not fair, but it's how it often is for professional women, especially professional women in a "man's" field.

Because I'd read the second book in the series first, I knew, going in, what was going to happen in the "surprise" ending, but I'm not going to spoil it here. I'm just going to say it's an unusual twist and I really, really liked it.

I also liked the characters, their relationships (Carol's brother Micheal the computer games designer is great, and the writing makes the book a fast, enjoyable read. Well, if enjoyable is the right word for a gruesome book of sorts.

One complaint, I read the e-book version, in EPUB, on my Sony Reader and it was FULL of errors and typos. It seriously looked like they'd used OCR to scan a paperback and never bothered to check the scans ("I've" was frequently "F've" for example). I don't know where you complain about e-book printing quality but it was really, really, really bad. I'd recommend trying to find a paperback copy of this book somewhere instead.

olivia_sutton: (Primeval)

The review was originally posted to my GoodReads account on 22 May 2013.

Recently, I decided to start re-reading Dorothy Sayer's Lord Peter Whimsey mysteries in chronological order. I hadn't read them since high school or maybe college, and I wasn't sure I'd even read them all.

Whose Body? introduces Lord Peter and his friends, and concerns two mysteries: a man who's gone missing in mysterious circumstances, and a body found in a bathtub, wearing nothing but a pince-nez (literally a "pinch-nose"; it's an old-fashioned type of glasses without ear pieces to hold them on). It quickly becomes apparent that the dead body that was found is not the missing man, however, Sayers weaves an intricate plot that does link the two crimes.

She's also introducing her characters in the "typical plot" fashion. That is, Lord Peter and his detective friend, Inspector Parker, have known each other for awhile and already trust each other. Bunter has been Lord Peter's valet and butler since The War (World War I) and possibly earlier, so all the characters all already fully formed. Lord Peter is a bit of a deceptive character -- at first he seems flighty and without a care or a thought in his head (like Wodehouse's Bertie Wooster) but actually he's cunning and clever -- and he desperately needs something to do, thus the turn at solving crimes. And he already has made a name for himself at being extremely good at it.

What I always found most interesting about Lord Peter, though, and Whose Body? contains a fine example of this, is that he's damaged... Peter's experiences in the war have left him with a fine case of PTSD (though as the novel was written in 1927 no one uses that term -- the 19th/early 20th century terms "shell shock" and "battle fatigue" are mentioned, however.) Sayers description of what Peter's going through is brilliant -- he's sitting in his study at night, thinking about the case, the fire has burned down to embers, and it's dark. He realises what must have happened (in the case), and starts to think of a plan to prove it... the next thing you know, he's waking up Bunter with shouts of "the guns" and "too loud" and the like, Bunter thinks to himself that Peter hasn't had such an attack in quite a while, and he calms him down, and gets him back into bed. The next morning, Lord Peter, none the worse for wear, goes out and with help from Inspector Parker (and Inspector Sugg, the first on the bathtub case) solves both cases. The intricate series of plot points works really well, and I liked it, so I won't spoil it here.

Overall, I'd recommend Whose Body? and any of the other Lord Peter books. One quickly becomes used to the "flighty" style of narration and language, and can delve into the story itself, which is quite fine.

olivia_sutton: (Woman Blog)
  • Title:  The Maltese Falcon (1931)
  • Director:  Roy Del Ruth
  • Date:  1931
  • Studio:  Warner Brothers
  • Genre:  Mystery
  • Cast:  Ricardo Cortez, Bebe Daniels
  • Format:  Standard, Black and White
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
“This is murder and don’t you forget it!”  -- Police Detective Dundee
This film is one of two earlier versions of Dashiell Hammett classic mystery included on the Warner Brothers three-disc  special edition of the classic Film Noir version starring Humphrey Bogart from 1941.  I actually avoided watching it for over a week.  However, it wasn’t as bad as I feared it might be.  It’s no classic, but it’s not a disaster either.
Richard Cortez plays Sam Spade as a hopeless flirt, who trades quips with his secretary and is definitely having an affair with his partner’s wife (something alluded to in the 1941 edition, but definitely toned down).  Archer, moreover, knows about his wife’s indiscretions.   The only woman Sam doesn’t seem to flirt with, is his client, Ms. Wonderly.
Since we actually see Archer in this film, he’s slightly more sympathetic.
Watching the 1931 version of  The Maltese Falcon is very much like watching a stage play version of a favorite film.  Much of  the  dialogue is the same or recognizable, but it’s delivered completely differently by a different crew of actors, none of whom are well-known.  I didn’t mind flirty Sam Spade, though Bogart gives a much more nuanced and haunted performance.  Bogart’s Spade is a man on the edge.  Cortez breezes through the film like he’s having a grand  time, and even reminded me a bit of Errol Flynn.  Bebe Daniels, in a way, I actually liked better than Mary Astor.  At least she’s fairly straight-forward, even when she’s lying to Sam.  (This version drops her multiple identites from the plot).  But the bit players – Cairo, Gutman, even Wilbur are very bland here.  The 1941 version is much better with Peter Lorre, Syndey Greenstreet and Elisha Cook Jr.
This film is much shorter (around 71 minutes), and less complicated.  And, like a play, many larger (more expensive to film) scenes are dropped or mentioned but not shown (we never see Archer’s body, or  the burning of La Poloma, the ship that brings the Falcon to San Francisco).  Also cut is some of Sam’s wondering around the streets of his city, thinking things over.
Recommendation:  Skip it, unless you happen to get a free version as an extra, then you may as well watch it.
Rating:  2.5 Stars
Next Film:  Mary Poppins
olivia_sutton: (Woman Blog)
  • Title:  L.A. Confidential
  • Director:  Curtis Hanson
  • Date:  1997
  • Studio:  Warner Brothers, Regency Entertainment
  • Genre:  Drama, Mystery, Film Noir
  • Cast:  Kevin Spacey, Russell Crowe, Guy Pearce, Kim Basinger, Danny DeVito, David Straithairn, Simon Baker (Credited as Simon Baker Denny)
"Come to Los Angeles... there are jobs a plenty and land is cheap..."  -- Sid Hudgens (Danny DeVito)

"I admire you as a policeman, particularly your adherance to violence as an adjunct to the job." -- Police Captain Dudley Smith to Lt. Bud White

"How's it going to look in your report?" -- Det. Lt. Exley
"It'll look like justice.  That's what the man got, justice." -- Lt. Bud White

LA Confidential is a brilliant modern film noir.  The film weaves deep layered characters into a complex plot of police corruption, graft, drugs, and murder.  All the actors give brilliant performances.  Russell Crowe, in an very early role, is Lt. Bud White, police captain Smith's "enforcer" with a soft spot for abused women.  Watching his journey from tough guy and bruiser to someone who actually starts to figure out what's going on and who stops just following orders and starts to think -- even when solving the case leads right back to the police department -- is a joy in this film.  Guy Pearce is the college-educated "new cop" who isn't afraid to testify against other dirty cops, as long as it allows him to get ahead.  But he too has to make decisions -- does he "do what he's told, and reap his reward" or does he follow a more difficult path and expose the corruption he and Bud have uncovered?  And brilliant as always Kevin Spacey as "Hollywood Jack" Vincennes, who's a technical advisor on the TV cop drama "Badge of Honor" (think "Dragnet") and partners with tabloid reporter Sid Hudgens (Danny Devito) accepting payments to pass along info about upcoming busts so the reporter can photograph them.  Sid, a pioneer in bottom-feeding tabloid journalism, and publisher of the tabloid "Hush-Hush" regularly gives Vincennes gifts and bribes, as well as passing along information.

The film weaves a complicated plot, starting with the beating, in the LA lock-up of several Mexican-Americans, resulting in the expulsion of several bad cops and meeting our characters and seeing how they react.  Vincennes is  transferred between departments and temporarily taken off  "Badge of Honor" as Technical Advisor.  White refuses to roll on his partner, or become a snitch.  Exley not only offers up info as a snitch, but gives advice on how to get to other cops, though this gets him a promotion - it doesn't endear him to the other cops.  After "Bloody Christmas" but before the trial even starts, there's a mass shooting at the Nite Owl coffee shop, one of the victims is White's disgraced partner.  The hunt for the killers leads to three young black men, who are brought in, questioned, escape, and then are caught again and killed.

However,  all three of our main characters soon realize that the three men, though guilty of kidnapping and raping a young Mexican girl, aren't guilty of the Nite Owl killings.  And, again, the investigation, though it also involves a millionaire who's running a high-class call girl outfit of girls "cut to look like movie stars" and heroin, ultimately leads right back to the police department.  I don't want to spoil the ending for those of you reading this who haven't seen this brilliant Noir film.

This film starts with a sarcastic voice-over, by Danny Devito, describing the bright, sunny, perfect California that's being sold as an image -- only to expose a dark, dirty, and very corrupt underbelly.  Irony underlies a lot of the picture (such as showing the ground-breaking ceremony for the Santa Monica freeway "LA to the beach in 20 minutes").  But the characters also present an opening image that changes throughout the film -- Bud White starts as a tough, an enforcer, a brutal cop, albeit with a soft spot for battered women and kids, but he develops, putting together a lot of the clues leading to an explanation of  what really is going on.  Exley seems like the college-educated "new cop" who won't be able to hack it in the field - yet, he also manages to prove his smarts and his investigative chops, as well as his ability to handle violence when needed.  Vincennes, "Hollywood Jack" has somehow lost his way.  Asked, "Why'd you become a cop?" He answers, "I can't remember".  Jack is like the tough, hard-boiled, cynical protagonists of a lot of Classic Noir.  Yet, like those protagonists, his journey in the film is to discover that he can't turn a blind eye to the corruption around him any more, especially when he inadvertently causes a young male actor/hooker to get murdered.  There's more to Jack than the smoothness one first sees.

The film is set in the 1950s, but the historical detail, though there, is not at the forefront of the film.  The score is fantastic from Jerry Goldsmith's original instrument themes, to the use of period music by Johnny Mercer and Dean Martin.  The film also gets physically darker, as the characters discover the true darkness around them.

I highly, highly recommend this film.  It has brilliant acting, brilliant writing, a dense, complex plot, and the feel of a true Noir film, but made in a modern style.  The film is very intelligent -- both the writing and dialogue and the plot.  And, though violent and bloody at times, it's still quite, quite worth seeing.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  5 of 5 Stars
Next Film:  League of Extra-Ordinary Gentlemen

March 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 06:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios